This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Sample Text

Monday, February 6, 2012

UP, down, sideways

THE famous speaker draws a hefty crowd, but little enthusiasm. Farmers and residents of Gorakhpur, a scruffy, fast-growing market town in eastern Uttar Pradesh (UP), have waited for hours in a wintry wind to hear him, weather-beaten old men huddling for warmth at the front. “I have no expectation,” says one of these. “I’ve only come to see.”

Rahul Gandhi’s stump speech (brief and earnest) earns few cheers. The heir both to the Gandhi-Nehru dynasty and the ruling Congress Party pledges a state government for UP of all castes and tribes. Rolling up his sleeves and jabbing a finger in the air, he talks of fighting corruption. He gets a single chuckle by telling of an elephant that chomps government money meant for the poor—a blunt reference to Mayawati, the charismatic teacher-turned-chief minister, whose wealth has attracted as-yet unproven accusations of massive graft.

It is hard-going for any politician in this fly-blown corner notorious for organised crime, smugglers and tense Hindu-Muslim relations. Gorakhpur made headlines late last year for an outbreak of encephalitis that killed over 640 people, mostly children. Alongside signs of new prosperity—the temptations along its clogged streets include the “He Man Hair Parlour”—abject poverty persists.

Mr Gandhi hurtles through three other rallies, then four the next day farther south, and so on. He has campaigned in UP for much of the past year, promising more welfare and land rights for the rural poor and talking up “Mission 2012”: reversing Congress’s meagre fortunes in India’s most populous state, with 200m residents. An election for the state assembly rolls out over the coming four weeks.

Congress had largely floundered in UP since the rise in recent decades of Ms Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party, which appeals to low-caste dalits and (for a time) upper-castebrahmins feeling squeezed. Today Congress wants to repeat its performance in the 2009 general election, when it nabbed 18% of votes in UP, a decent share given fragmented voting in the state, partly by talk of dishing out rural welfare. This time round, such a result would probably return Congress to state government, after 22 years away, as a needed junior partner to the Samajwadi Party (SP).

Led by Mulayam Singh Yadav, a political gadfly and former defence minister, the SP (backed by lower castes, but not the lowest) might then return the favour by allying with Congress at a national level. A tempting cabinet post in Delhi would sweeten the deal. It would give the government of the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, desperately needed legislative clout, and fresh sway over some troublesome allies. Just possibly, it might cause some long-stalled policy reforms to flow.

If that sounds optimistic, consider that at least one political figure, not in Congress, expects the party to spring an even greater surprise in UP. On this analysis, Mr Gandhi’s dogged campaigning, especially among young, first-time voters, will win the party a notably higher share of votes than before. In that event, calls will only grow for Mr Gandhi to take on a bigger job, such as Mr Singh’s.

Much is uncertain. The main national opposition, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), seems to be making little impact. Its member of parliament in Gorakhpur, Yogi Adityanath, a surly man in woolly hat and saffron robes, prefers to talk about the desperation of his own party (for accepting a corrupt defector from Ms Mayawati’s camp) rather than bash his opponents.


Nor is it clear how far Ms Mayawati’s star has fallen since her clear victory in 2007. Educated, high-caste types relish her setbacks. The Electoral Commission told her to shroud many of the statues of elephants (her party symbol) and of herself that dot the state. On the eve of the polls, she sacked several ministers as officials exposed a shameful $1.2 billion scandal in a rural health scheme. Tens of millions of people remain stuck in a sink of feudalism, repression and hunger.

She can point to some gains, nonetheless. Her biographer, Ajoy Bose, says that dalits, whom he suggests are “prone to totemism”, feel their dignity lifted by the many statues of dalit symbols. Violent crime and communal tension are down sharply since the early 2000s, when hoodlums of the then-ruling Samajwadi Party took over police stations. A man from western UP, now working in Delhi, says Ms Mayawati has brought electricity to his village and has done more than anyone for the “depressed and suppressed”.

The state economy has also done pretty well, growing by some 7% a year recently, roughly India’s average (though gains per person lag behind). Public finances are improving, and Ms Mayawati has overseen the building of 200,000 homes for the poor, free bicycles for schoolgirls, extra power stations and the construction of India’s Formula 1 racetrack.

Shifting sands

Though the chief minister may have lost sway among brahmins, she can still probably expect loyalty from her core dalit backers, a fifth of the state. That is despite efforts by Mr Gandhi, who likes to be seen eating with the low-caste and who tries to break off sub-castes among them with targeted promises—for example, by offering to set up special institutes for boatmen, fishermen and carpenters.

Uttar Pradesh is only one of five states—though by far the biggest—holding assembly elections. Turnout of over 80% was reported as Manipur (in the north-east) and Punjab and Uttarakhand (both in the north) voted early this week. It suggests Indians are far from tired of electoral democracy, despite some excited commentary in the aftermath of street protests last year against corruption. Tiny Goa will also vote on March 3rd, with all results due on March 6th.

These results in turn will feed other big elections. In April a new clutch of 58 members of the upper house of the national parliament, the Rajya Sabha, will be elected (by the state assemblies). Then in July, both houses of parliament, plus all the state assemblies, must elect someone as India’s president, with a five-year term.

Some speculate that Mr Singh might also step down as prime minister before long, leaving the way clear for a younger leader to battle for Congress as campaigning looms for the next general election, in 2014. Just maybe, somewhere between all the campaigning, there will be time for some governing too

Top Stories of 2011: All Apple All the Time


[SB10001424052970204791104577108661327209898]
The company dominated the headlines—and captivated The Wall Street Journal readers' interest—this past year, from product launches that stoked frenzy to the somber news of co-founder Steve Jobs 's death.
Eight of the ten most-viewed corporate stories on WSJ.com for the year were about the consumer-technology company, which became the world's most valuable tech company during the year.
Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen lashing out at fellow co-founder Bill Gates in a memoir and the liquidation of the Borders Group Inc. bookstore chain grabbed the remaining two spots.
The list doesn't include finance and investing articles, political events or general news, such as the death of Osama bin Laden or the Japan earthquake and tsunami.
Apple's year began with the long-awaited news that Verizon Wireless would carry the iPhone, ending AT&T Inc.'s nearly four-year U.S. exclusive on the smartphone. Months later, Sprint Nextel Corp. got its piece of the iPhone action, an article that WSJ readers also flocked to in droves.
In mid-January, another news cycle emerged around Mr. Jobs's health, as he took his third medical leave and put chief operating officer Tim Cook  in charge. Speculation about Mr. Jobs's health—a subject of long-time fascination among Apple-watchers—was eclipsed, for a time, by more product news. The company unveiled a new, thinner iPad in March, where an ailing Mr. Jobs was a surprise master of ceremonies.
Consumers, ever more dependent on their mobile devices, also took interest in a piece revealing how Apple and competitor Google Inc. gathered location data from smartphones, as Washington, D.C., intensified its scrutiny of tech companies' privacy practices.
Attention soon swung back to Apple's devices. Buzz around the company's next expected new gadget—a new iPhone—built steadily until early October, when one was unveiled by Mr. Cook, who officially became CEO in August.
A day later, Mr. Jobs died at his home in Palo Alto, Calif., at the age of 56. Mourners flocked to Apple stores and shared what the technology visionary meant to them online. The Journal's obituary was WSJ.com's most read corporate story of the year.Some fans were underwhelmed by the device, which had an array of new software features but looked like the old iPhone 4. Apple still sold a record four million of the devices in the first three days of sales.
Author Walter Isaacson soon released his highly anticipated "Steve Jobs" biography, which he wrote with cooperation from the founder, creating a frenzy of interest in the jabs Mr. Jobs made at rivals like Google and the hints he dropped about future products, such as a television set made by Apple. The title was Amazon.com Inc.'s best-selling book of the year published in 2011.


Monday, September 20, 2010

No blind support to govt: PML-N




LAHORE: The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) on Sunday vowed to continue supporting democracy but said it would not extend blind support to the government, whom it accused of committing mismanagement and irregularities, reported a private TV channel.
A meeting held under the chairmanship of party chief Nawaz Sharif at his Raiwind residence, discussed the political situation, flood devastation, petrol crisis and NA-61 by-polls. The PML-N chief said there were no personal differences with the federal government. He said he would defend democracy and reiterated his support for the democratic system.
Nawaz, however, made clear that adherence to and support for democracy would not force the party to give cover to the government’s “mismanagement and irregularities”. Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, National Assembly opposition leader Chaudhry Nisar, members of National Assembly Khawaja Muhammad Asif, Ayaz Ameer and several others participated in the meeting. A widening rift between the PML-N and the ruling Pakistan People’s Party also came under discussion. A strategy was also devised for the National Assembly and Senate sessions. The meeting also analysed Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani’s speeches which he made in Lahore.


Taliban bomb another school in Peshawar



PESHAWAR: The Taliban bombed another school in the provincial metropolis on Sunday night, creating a shockwave of fear and panic among students and parents in the city, police said.

According to Lateef Khan, a guard at the Government Middle School targeted by the Taliban, an improvised bomb destroyed the school building when it exploded with a big bang at 2:10am.

“A thick black smoke engulfed the area soon after the blast and I also heard gun fire,” he said, adding that a major part of the building had been razed to the ground.

Arshad Khan, a spokesman of the Tehkal police, told Daily Times that the blast destroyed several rooms of the three-storey school, while the school guard remained unhurt.

According to school officials, at least 10,000 boys had been enrolled in the school, including 800 in the middle and 200 in primary sections.

Taliban had earlier blown up a private school in the outskirts of Peshawar on Saturday night.

Police said the Taliban had targeted Rozatul Atfaal Academy in Charkhakhel village at around 1:40am and destroyed it while a girls’ school was blown up in Landi Arbab area of the city on September 6.

According to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, more than 1,000 schools had been destroyed in Taliban bombing while floods damaged 900 schools. Repair and reconstruction of the school will cost the government Rs 5 billion, it said.

On August 22, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain warned that terrorists were regrouping outside Peshawar and had demanded both federal and provincial governments to launch an immediate operation against them in Darra Adam Khel, Khyber and Mohmand agencies bordering Peshawar.

Daily Times Monitor




LAHORE: The Scotland Yard, investigating into Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader Dr Imran Farooq’s murder, and police are likely to question senior party leaders in the coming days, a private TV cannel reported on Sunday.

According to the British press reports, which cited security sources, the murder inquiry had been taken over by the Scotland Yard’s Counter-Terrorism Command, which investigates political assassinations. The MI5 is also likely to be called in to help with the hunt for the killers, the channel said.

Detectives in London have not ruled out the possibility that Dr Farooq was killed in a robbery bid, but no evidence has been found in this respect. The eyewitnesses said the killer was an Asian, the channel reported.

Turn upon turn on the LHC CJ assassination plot



LAHORE: The fiasco about hatching a plot to assassinate Lahore High Court Chief Justice Khawaja Muhammad Sharif takes a new turn every day and so far no one has been able to predict how the outcome of this battle will affect politics.
Reports about the inquiry of this conspiracy proved that this is a war between titans and it seems that this clash will definitely ruin the lower government functionaries, who were used like a tissue paper by some provincial-level hidden, but influential hands.
This bewilderment started on September 11 when the Punjab CM’s secretary, Syed Tauqeer Shah, deliberately publicised a ‘secret report’ about a plot being hatched to assassinate the LHC CJ, which in itself is a crime and violation of the Official Secrets Act.
Col (r) Ehsanur Rehman, the Special Branch additional IG at that time and currently the Punjab Civil Defence director general, had sent this report to the CM, which was in a sealed envelope, and on the top of the envelope were written the words, ‘For Eyes Only’ and ‘Urgent, Confidential and Secret’.
Following the release of the abovementioned Special Branch report, the federal government directed the ISI, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the FIA to investigate the alleged plot.
The Interior Ministry then assigned the task of probing the issue to FIA Punjab Director Zafar Ahmed Qureshi and to submit a report in coordination with the Punjab Police inspector general.
The inquiry is ongoing and on Saturday, it took yet another turn when Ehsanur Rehman contradicted his own statement during the inquiry being held by police. According to a published report, Ehsan earlier during an FIA inquiry had admitted about the existence of the secret report, which he sent to the CM, and the FIA’s inquiry officers had also recorded his statement. Later, on Saturday during an inquiry by police, Ehsan denied and deviated from his earlier stance on which the inquiry officer reminded him about his previous statement before the FIA officers.
How strange is it that a senior-most officer of the Punjab Police Department is continuously changing his statements about a very sensitive issue in which he is directly involved. However, on the other hand, according to the contents of the abovementioned secret report, suspects Iqbal Mir, Nadeem Chohan, Babar Chaudhry, Khawaja Farooq, Malik Ehsan, Babar Sandhoo, Riaz Gujjar, Mian Kashif, Khurram Gujjar and Samiullah alias Rana Pomi hatched the plot to assassinate the LHC CJ.
The report further disclosed that some of the suspects were to attack the LHC CJ at his native home during a religious ceremony. The report claimed that the accused, including Sandhoo, would then escape and take refuge in Lambray village near Muridke at the farm of Riaz Gujjar, where the alleged plot was first hatched.
Amazingly, local police has said that there is no such farmhouse near Muridke and Riaz is a local schoolteacher. The secret report also claimed that the alleged plotters were seen at venues such as the Governor’s House and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Punjab headquarters at Chamba House.
The Punjab Police arrested suspects and kept them at the CIA Centre Iqbal Town under tight security. They were interrogated by intelligence agency officials as well as the FIA inquiry officer. However, after a week of interrogation, no solid proof about the alleged plot has been uncovered.
There is speculation among senior officers of law enforcement and intelligence agencies that the author of the aforementioned secret report, Ehsanur Rehman, withdrew an amount of Rs 1.7 million from a secret fund in August before relieving his charge and joining the Civil Defence Department. In order to justify this amount and to obtain the favour by the Punjab CM by maligning the top Pakistan People’s Party leadership, Ehsan came up with the idea of concocting an intelligence memo about a fake plot against the LHC CJ.
Further interesting facts were also disclosed in the interim report of the inquiry officer, FIA Director Zafar Qureshi. The interim report disclosed that the six detainees did not know each other before their arrest. The report said that Ehsan had prepared the intelligence memo and sent it to the Punjab CM. The interim report further disclosed that Dr Syed Tauqeer Shah had leaked the secret report.
The report stated that Iqbal Mir, a suspect in the case, had a detailed criminal record. He was the prime suspect in the murder case of former Punjab additional advocate general Arif Bhinder and was released on May 15. Bhinder had been assassinated along with others due to his old enmity with Zahid alias Zahdo.
Other suspects Nadeem Chohan, Babar Chaudhry and Khawaja Farooq were released by the LHC in the murder case of former inspector Naveed Saeed. Sources said that allegedly all three suspects had strong links with PPP high-ups and the murdered inspector Naveed Saeed was a close relative of Rana Maqbool.
However, the fifth suspect Malik Ehsan is already wanted by the Lahore police due to his alleged involvement in the murder of Arif Ameer alias Tippu Truckanwala (relative of another influential personality of the Punjab government) and according to sources he is currently residing in Dubai. Sources disclosed that Malik Ehsan had directly opposed the PML-N during the previous election and now one of the close relatives of Shahbaz Sharif is allegedly interfering in the investigation of the murder case of Arif Hamid. The sixth suspect Babur Sandhoo had been released earlier from the murder case of Justice Nizam and his son.
The reports confirmed that all suspects had rifts with the PML-N or its leadership during different times and now they were declared suspects for hatching a plot to assassinate the LHC CJ.
So far all efforts, investigations and inquiries of this fiasco have proved that the Punjab government or its functionaries tried to settle old scores through this special report, but failed. It is also proved that even after more than one and a half century, the Punjab Police is still just a tool for influential personalities.

Of prices, price controlling and social behaviours


LAHORE: Be it vegetables or chicken, beef or mutton, dry milk or liquid milk, grams or gram flour, fruits or any other food items – the retail price usually remains high in the city’s markets compared to the production cost.
It seems that wholesalers and retailers have been given a free hand to fix the rates of various commodities at their own whim because the government has failed to implement and monitor prices of daily-use edible items.  A recent example in this regard was the tussle between the poultry association, chicken retail shops and the city district government. Despite all claims and the constitution of monitoring committees and price control magistrates, the city district government failed to implement the Rs 170 per kilogramme price of chicken meat. Almost all chicken shops across the city are selling meat for Rs 220-250 per kilogramme.
There are various factors behind the government’s failure to establish its writ in the retail market. Firstly, the government’s focus has been towards politics and the whole state machinery is being used for political face-saving and number-scoring. The issues of consumer rights and price control are perhaps in the least preference list of the government. The government seems in a compromising position on all important issues. Also, on the poultry price issue, the government compromised with the association regarding the establishment of 100 standard price chicken shops, which are practically nowhere in the city. Another example may be the prices of beef and mutton, which the government has fixed at Rs 175 and Rs 250 respectively, but these are available in the city market for Rs 240 and Rs 460, flouting the government orders.
The government, during its two-and-a-half-year tenure has failed to ensure the implementation of meat prices for even a single day.
The second factor is the half-hearted action on part of the price controlling authorities and the taking of bribes from wholesalers and retailers after discovering any violation of the price lists. Thirdly, there is no concept of citizen community groups and consumer rights associations in Lahore. Everyone is bearing the brunt of inflation, dearness and price list violations, but there is no collective voice of consumer rights in society. The profiteers are taking the advantage of a lack of unity among community groups. In the US, China, Europe and other parts of the world, consumers are well aware of their rights and powers in the social economic systems. They do not bear any price increase and boycott the sale of any products if any surge in prices in witnessed.
Recently, such a practice has been reported in India where consumer rights groups have been activated.
Fourthly, in our cities, people start storing commodities in case of any report of shortage or price increase. Such practices increase the demand of a particular commodity in the market, triggering a price hike. There is a dire need to change this kind of behaviour by sensitising citizens on this important social issue because educated citizens are equally involved in practice of unnecessary storage of commodities.
Mostly, those who have high purchase power are responsible for disturbing the supply and demand balance of a commodity. The city district government has failed to control the prices of daily-use vegetable items, including onions, potatoes, tomatoes, ginger and garlic in the city’s markets as wholesalers and retailers are charging higher prices on Sunday.
During a survey of various vegetable shops on Sunday, Daily Times discovered that onions were being sold at Rs 60-80 per kilogramme, potatoes for Rs 40-60, tomatoes for Rs 50-60, green chilies for Rs 100-140, lemons for Rs 100 to Rs 120, ginger for Rs 200 to Rs 250 and garlic for Rs 250 to Rs 300. 
Most vegetable retailers had not bothered to display government rate lists and those who did, failed to implement the rates.
Maria Zaheer, a housewife, said it had become very difficult for her to run her kitchen because of high prices of daily-use vegetable items. “I have started using yogurt in place of tomatoes, but it too is costly, however there are no replacements for ginger, onions and potatoes,” she said. 
Haji Nazir, a vegetable retailer asked how he could sell vegetables on government rates when he himself was getting these items on increased rates from the vegetable market. “I have to pay for transportation besides paying the rent of my shops… if the government really wants to control the rates it should establish its writ in the vegetable markets first,” he said.
Ghulam Murtaza, a consumer rights activist in Gulberg, told Daily Times that he had convinced the people of his area to stop purchasing vegetables, fruits and meat on increased rates. “We have sensitised many people in our areas to always demand the rate list before purchasing anything and not to store food items,” he said.